首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing Online Reading and Discussion Boards on Facebook as Pre-Writing Activities to Improve Students\u27 Writing Achievement
【2h】

Developing Online Reading and Discussion Boards on Facebook as Pre-Writing Activities to Improve Students\u27 Writing Achievement

机译:在Facebook上开发在线阅读和讨论板作为写作前活动,以提高学生的写作成绩

摘要

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui apakah online reading dan discussion boards pada facebook sebagai kegiatan pre-writing dapat meningkatkan kualitas writinglebih baik daripada kegiatan pre-writing melalui printed text reading, aspek writing apa yang meningkat secara signifikan dan persepsi siswa terhadap ORDB. Pada desain quantitatif, uji tes awal dan tes akhir kelompok kontrol dilakukan dan pada desain qualitatif, kuesioner dilaksankan.Pada pengumpulan data, teswriting, analisa dokumen, dan kuesioner digunakan. Subyek dibagi dua kelompok, eksperimen dan kontrol, masing-masing terdiri dari 17 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukan nilai signifikan dua arah 0.000. Berdasarkan aspek writing yang meningkat secara signifikan, ORDB meningkatkan kualitas writing terutama pada vocabulary. Siswa meningkat pada vocabulary dengan penambahan 1.62 (8.1%) dengan pre-writing melalui printed-text reading dan 3.06 (15.3%) dengan ORDB. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan pada kedua kegiatan pre-writing. Berdasarkan kuesioner, diketahui bahwa metode ini dapat meningkatkan motivasi dan partisipasi dalam menulis.This research was conducted to find out whether online reading and discussion boards on facebook as pre-writing activities can improve writing quality better than pre-writing activity through printed text, what aspects of writing significantly improved, and the students\u27 perception of ORDB. In quantitative design, control group pre-test and post-test design was conducted and in qualitative design, questionnaire was conducted. To collect the data, the writing test, document analysis, and questionnaire were used. The subjects were divided into two groups, the experimental and control, each consists of 17. The result showed the value of two-tailed significance was 0.000. Based on the aspects of writing which are significantly improved, ORDB promoted their writing performance mainly in vocabulary. Students improved vocabulary with gain 1.62 (8.1%) with pre-writing through printed text and 3.06 (15.3%) with ORDB. The result showed the difference of both pre-writing. Based on questionnaire, it was noted that it may increase motivation and participation in writing.
机译:进行这项研究的目的是,了解在Facebook上作为预写作活动的在线阅读和讨论板是否比通过印刷文本阅读来提高预写作活动的写作质量,显着改善了哪些写作方面以及学生对ORDB的认知程度。在定量设计中,进行了对照组的初步检验和最终检验,在定性设计中,进行了问卷调查,并在数据收集,写作,文献分析和问卷调查中进行了调查。这些科目分为两组,分别为实验组和对照组,每组由17名学生组成。结果显示双向有效值为0,000。基于写作方面的显着提高,ORDB提高了写作质量,尤其是词汇方面。通过印刷文本阅读进行预写作,学生提高了词汇量,增加了1.62(8.1%);使用ORDB,则提高了3.06(15.3%)。结果表明两种预写活动存在差异。根据调查问卷,我们知道这种方法可以提高写作动机和参与度,目的是为了了解在Facebook上作为预写活动的在线阅读和讨论板是否比通过打印文本的预写活动更好地改善写作质量,写作方面有显着改善,并且学生对ORDB的认识。在定量设计中,进行对照组的前测试和后测试设计,在定性设计中,进行问卷调查。为了收集数据,使用了写作测试,文档分析和问卷调查。受试者分为实验组和对照组,每组17人。结果显示,两尾显着性的值为0,000。基于写作方面的显着改进,ORDB主要在词汇方面提高了他们的写作表现。通过打印文字进行预写作,学生可以提高词汇量,达到1.62(8.1%),而使用ORDB,则可以提高3.06(15.3%)。结果表明两种预写的差异。在调查表的基础上,有人指出,这可能会增加写作的动机和参与度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号